Sonority Hypothesis Statement

On By In 1

Step 5: Hypothesis Statement

Hypothesis Statement

(will be worked on in class prior to due date)

Your hypothesis statement will be turned in during science class, reviewed by the teacher and returned. Below is a short explanation of a hypothesis statement and some examples of hypothesis statements.

Hypothesis statement--a prediction that can be tested or an educated guess.

In a hypothesis statement, students make a prediction about what they think will happen or is happening in their experiment. They try to answer their question or problem.


Question: Why do leaves change colors in the fall?

Hypothesis: I think that leaves change colors in the fall because they are not being exposed to as much sunlight.

Hypothesis: Bacterial growth may be affected by temperature.

Hypothesis: Chocolate may cause pimples


All of these are examples of hypotheses because they use the tentative word "may." However, their form in not particularly useful. Using the word does not suggest how you would go about proving it. If these statements had not been written carefully, they may not have been a hypotheses at all.

A better way to write a hypotheses is to use a formalized hypotheses

Example: If skin cancer is related to ultraviolet light, then people with a high exposure to uv light will have a higher frequency of skin cancer.

Example: If leaf color change is related to temperature, then exposing plants to low temperatures will result in changes in leaf color.

Example: If the rate of photosynthesis is related to wave lengths of light, then exposing a plant to different colors of light will produce different amounts of oxygen.

Example: If the volume of a gas is related to temperature, then increasing the temperature will increase the volume.

These examples contain the words, if and then. Formalized hypotheses contain two variables. One is "independent" and the other is "dependent." The independent variable is the one you, the scientist control and the dependent variable is the one that you observe and/or measure the results.

The ultimate value of a formalized hypotheses is it forces us to think about what results we should look for in an experiment.

Example: If the diffusion rate (dependent variable) through a membrane is related to molecular size (independent variable), then the smaller the molecule the faster it will pass through the membrane.




  • Bates, E., Thal, D., and Janowsky, J.S. (in press). Early language development and its neural correlates. In I. Rapin & S. Segalowitz (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology. Vol. 6, Child Neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

  • Bauer, H.R. (1988). The ethologic model of phonetic development: I. Phonetic contrast estimators. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 2, 347–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Berg, T. (1989). Intersegmental cohesiveness. Folia Linguistica, 23, 245–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Bloom, K. (1988). Quality of adult vocalizations affects the quality of infant vocalizations. Journal of Child Language, 15, 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Carey, S., and Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17–29.Google Scholar

  • Crais, E. (1987). Fast mapping of novel words in oral story context. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development, 26, 40–47.Google Scholar

  • Christman, S.S. (1992a). Abstruse neologism formation: parallel processing revisited. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 6, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Christman, S.S. (1992b). Uncovering phonological regularity in neologisms: Contributions of sonority theory. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 6, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Clements, G.N. (1988). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, No. 2. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar

  • Clements, G.N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cutler, A. (1992). The production and perception of word boundaries. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, and Y. Sagisaka (Eds.), Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure (pp. 419–425). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar

  • Dollaghan, C. (1987). Fast mapping in normal and language- impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 218–222.Google Scholar

  • Drake, C., and Gerard, C. (1989). A psychological pulse train: How young children use this cognitive framework to structure simple rhythms. Psychological Research, 51, 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Edelman, G.M. (1989). The Remembered Present. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar

  • Edwards, J., and Beckman, M.E. (1988). Articulatory timing and the prosodie interpretation of syllable duration. Phonetica, 45, 156–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Fernald, A., and Mazzie, C. (1991). Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27, 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Fraisse, P. (1982). Rhythm and tempo. In D. Deutch (Ed.), The Psychology of Music (pp. 149–180). New York: Academic.Google Scholar

  • Fudge, E.C. (1969). Syllables. Journal of Linguistics, 5, 193–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldsmith, J.A. (1990). Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Hodge, M.M. (1989). A comparison of spectral-temporal measures across speaker age: Implications for an acoustic characterization of speech maturation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar

  • Keating, P. (1983). Comments on the jaw and syllable structure. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 401–406.Google Scholar

  • Kent, R.D., and Bauer, H.R. (1985). Vocalizations of one year olds. Journal of Child Language, 12, 491–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Kent, R.D., Mitchell, P.R., and Sander, M. (1991). Evidence and role of rhythmic organization in early vocal development in human infants. In J. Fagard and P. Wolff (Eds.), The Development of Timing Control and Temporal Organization in Coordinated Action (pp. 135–149). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Ladefoged, P. (1982). A Course on Phonetics. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

  • MacNeilage, P.F., and Davis, B. (1990). Acquisition of speech production: Frames, then content. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance. XIII: Motor Representation and Control. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • McCarthy, L. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 84–108.Google Scholar

  • Mehler, J., and Christophe, A. (1992). Speech processing and segmentation in Romance languages. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, and Y. Sagisaka (eds.), Speech Perception, Production, and Linguistic Structure (pp. 221–238). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar

  • Oiler, D.K. (1986). Metaphonology and infant vocalizations. In B. Lindblom and R. Zetterstrom (Eds.), Early Precursors of Speech (pp. 21–35). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Oller, D.K., and Eilers, R.E. (1988). The role of audition in infant babbling. Child Development, 59, 441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Povel, DJ. (1981). Internal representation of temporal patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Price, P.J. (1980). Sonority and syllabicity: Acoustic correlates of perception. Phonetica, 37, 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Prince, A.S. (1980). A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 511–562.Google Scholar

  • Rice, M.L., Buhr, J.C., and Nemeth, M. (1990). Fast mapping word learning abilities of language-delayed preschoolers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 33–42.Google Scholar

  • Robb, M., and Bauer, H.R. (1991). The ethologic model of phonetic development: II. The closant curve. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 5, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Selkirk, E. (1982). The syllable. In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (Eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part II. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar

  • Smith, M.R., Cutler, A., Butterfield, S., and Nimmo-Smith, I. (1989). The perception of rhythm and word boundaries in noise-masked speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 912–920.Google Scholar

  • Stoel-Gammon, C. (1987). Phonological skills of 2-year-olds. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 18, 323–329.Google Scholar

  • Stoel-Gammon, C. (1989). Prespeech and early speech development in two late talkers. First Language, 9, 207–224. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Trehub, S.E. (1989). Infants’ perception of musical sequences: Implications for language acquisition. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 13, 3–11.Google Scholar

  • Vihman, M.M. (1992). Early syllables and the construction of phonology. In C.A. Ferguson, L. Menn and C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications. Timonium, MD, York Press 393–422.Google Scholar


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *